Legal Opinion

Brillow v. Oziemkowski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1904No. Gen. No. 10,911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Farr and, Judge, presiding Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

Appellant filed in the Count}' Court a motion in writing for a new trial, specifying the grounds therefor, which did not state or include as a ground for new trial that the court refused to give instructions asked for bv appellant.

In this court he assigns for error the refusal of the tual court to give certain instructions. By filing his points in writing in support of his motion for a new trial and omitting therefrom the point that the court erred in refusing to give instructions requested by him, he waived his right to assign for error here the refusal of the court to give such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West Chicago Street Railroad v. KruegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tri-City Railway Co. v. WeaverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krensky v. LynchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Koehler v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API