Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Kinsey

New York Family Court

Decided August 6, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.

There is presented a novel question as to the meaning and effect of chapter 786 of the Laws of 1950 in relation to previously enacted subdivisions (4) and (9) of section 92 and subdivision 4 of section 101 of the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York.

That 1950 enactment amended the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York by inserting a new section (§ 92-a) and another subdivision in section 92 (subd. [6-a]) and adding a sentence at the end of subdivision 1 of section 101 as follows:

“ § 92. Powers * * * (6-a) To make an order requiring a wife, if she is of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Betz v. HorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hammond v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kane v. NecciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. In re the Accounting of McClancyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campas v. CampasNew York Family Court · 1969
  2. Armstead v. DumpsonNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sanders v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Samson ex rel. Schoen v. SchoenNew York Family Court · 1953
  5. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services v. MenardNew York City Family Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API