Office Depot, Inc. v. Sweikata
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR REHEARING
ERVIN, J.
We grant appellee/cross-appellant’s motion for clarification, deny the parties’ motions for rehearing, and substitute the following opinion.
Office Depot, Inc., and Kemper Insurance Companies, the employer and carrier (E/C), appeal an order awarding attendant care and permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, and authorizing chiropractic and psychiatric treatment. Sally Sweikata, the claimant, cross-appeals portions of the attendant care and PTD awards and the denial of an increase in the average weekly wage. We reverse the authorization…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Pensacola Firefighters v. OswaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Clairson Intern. v. RoseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Buena Vida Townhouse Ass'n v. ParciakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. HadleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Cespedes v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Arlotta v. City of West Palm BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Johnson v. Superior National InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. HadleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.