Legal Opinion

State v. Kincade

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2013No. 61262; 61263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

In this case, we consider whether the district court properly excluded evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant where the warrant did not comply with NRS 179.045(5)’s requirement that a warrant include a statement of probable cause or have the affidavit upon which probable cause was based attached. Recognizing that a state may provide broader protections to its citizens than provided by the U.S. Constitution, we reaffirm our decision in State v. Allen, 119 Nev. 166, 69 P.3d 232 (2003) (Allen II), and conclude that failure to comply with NRS 179.045(5)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Osburn v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  2. ACOSTA (XAVIER) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API