Legal Opinion

Long v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1982No. Nos. 81-938, 81-1008, 81-1069 and 81-1070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

The state charged appellants Whitehead and Gillen with violation of the RICO statute and charged all three appellants with conspiracy to traffic in certain controlled substances. The appellants ultimately pled nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the denial of several motions.

Appellants Whitehead and Gillen argue that their RICO convictions must be reversed because the state’s information against them was identical to the one we deemed legally insufficient in Beatty v. State, 418 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The state argues under the rationale of Dean v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Beatty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API