Legal Opinion

United States v. Bridges

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 4, 1958No. 10,927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, pursuant to Article 67 (b) (2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867, has certified the following issue to this Court for its consideration:

“Was the Board of Review correct in holding that the charges of missing movement through design and unauthorized absence were multipli-cious for purposes of sentence, thus requiring an instruction to this effect on the maximum sentence?”

A brief statement of facts is necessary to place the certified issue in its proper setting.

On or about 7:15 a.m. on the morning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. HenleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. UnderwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. GambiniU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. DotsonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. RuffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. HardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API