Legal Opinion
Cowan v. Krayzman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 2011No. B218663PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIGELOW, P. J.
Defendant and appellant Boris Krayzman appeals from a default judgment entered against him. Krayzman filed a motion to vacate the default. After the trial court issued a tentative ruling denying the motion, Krayzman attempted to withdraw the motion before it was to be heard. He then filed a second version of the motion. The trial court adopted its tentative ruling denying the first version of the motion to vacate as its final order and did not consider the second version of the motion. Krayzman contends the trial court erred by not considering his motion to vacate on its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lang v. HochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Symmonds v. Mahoney, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Behm v. Clear View TechnologiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Darab N. v. Olivera, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Behm v. Clear View TechnologiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.