Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHEN, Circuit Judge.
Callidus Software Inc. appeals from the district court’s denial of a stay pending the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (Patent Office) covered business method review of the patents-in-suit. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand with instructions to stay the action.
Baokground
Versata Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata, Inc. (collectively, Versata) brought suit against Calli-dus on July 19, 2012, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,904,326 (the '326 patent); 7,908,304 (the '304 patent); and 7,958,024 (the '024…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Benefit Funding Systems LLC v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
3Cited by12 opinions
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Protegrity Corp. v. Epicor Software Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Dental Monitoring v. Get-Grin Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Godox Photo Equipment Co. Ltd. v. Profoto AktiebolagDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.