Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1916No. 7315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Conviction of assault with intent to rape; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright.. February 15, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, O. J.

Where one charged with crime is between the ages of ten and fourteen, there is a presumption that he is non capax doli, and the State carries the burden of rebutting by proof this presumption. In the present case the only evidence touching the age of the defendant was that he was only thirteen years of age at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, and there were no circumstances in proof, nor is there anything in the record, from which a contrary inference can be deduced. The prosecution having wholly failed to rebut the presumption arising from proof that the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. McRae v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API