Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Topp v. BIG ROCK FOUNDATION, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 2012No. COA11-681Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge,

concurring in part, and dissenting, in part.

I concur with the majority that the trial court did not err in granting Defendants’ motion to change venue. I must, however, respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion for two reasons. First, I would reverse the trial court’s order denying Plaintiffs’ motion to recuse as I conclude Judge Nobles should have referred the motion to another judge for an independent hearing. Second, apart from the recusal motion, I conclude the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

*74I. Motion to Recuse

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Coleman v. ShirlenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In Re FairclothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Lough v. Varsity Bowl, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Malone v. Topsail Area Jaycees, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API