Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Newton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1990No. KJ 89 1042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOIL, Judge.

Aneko L. Newton was charged by petition as. delinquent on the basis of commission of purse snatching, a violation of La. R.S. 14:65.1. Although the record is not absolutely clear, it appears that, pursuant to a plea agreement, the petition was amended in writing on February 11, 1988, to charge accessory after the fact to purse snatching. See La.R.S. 14:25 and 65.1. However, the agreement did not bear fruit; and the trial judge ordered that the juvenile be tried on the original charge. Additionally, the case was transferred to another judge.

On July 1, 1988, the state orally amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State in Interest of DinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. State in Interest of BatisteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. State v. ButtnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. State, in Interest of WilkersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. In Interest of RodriguesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarclayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Turbine Powered Technology, LLC v. David Crowe, Kenneth Braccio, Daniel Foley, George Jackson, Kent Ellsworth, Arizona Turbine Technology, L.L.C, Arizona Turbine Technology, Inc., Advance Turbine Services, L.L.C. & Turbine Integrated Power Systems, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API