Poppenhusen v. Falke
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
[This was a bill in equity filed [by Conrad Poppenhusen] to restrain the defendants [Oscar Palke and others] from infringing the patents granted to L. Otto P. Meyer which are more particularly referred to in .the reports of the eases of Poppenhusen v. New.
Read the full summary
[This was a bill in equity filed [by Conrad Poppenhusen] to restrain the defendants [Oscar Palke and others] from infringing the patents granted to L. Otto P. Meyer which are more particularly referred to in .the reports of the eases of Poppenhusen v. New. York Gutta-Percha Comb Co. [Cases Nos. 11,2S3, 11,281, and 11.2S2], and of Pop-penhusen v. Palke [Case No. 11,279]. In the last named case, a motion for a provisional injunction was granted upon the “grease patent,” and denied upon the “tin-foil patent.” This case now came on for final hearing upon both patents and was argued before the…
1Opinion of the Court
SHIPMAN, District Judge.
In deciding the controversy between the parties to this suit, we do not feel called upon to discuss in detail the mass of matter which has been introduced into the case. Much of it, if not wholly immaterial, sheds but a feeble light on the main points upon which the rights of the parties must rest, and it is to these points, and the facts and principles directly bearing upon them, that we shall direct what we have to say. Before stating these points, and the conclusions to which we have come, it will be well to refer to the subject .matter of the patents in question,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Blessing v. Works.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989