Legal Opinion

Miller, Et Vir v. Carr

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This is the second appearance of this case here. See Miller v. Carr, 137 Fla. 114, 188 Sou. 103.

On the going down of the mandate, plaintiff filed fourth amended declaration. Demurrer thereto was sustained and judgment entered.

The law of the case was established in the opinion and judgment, supra. In that opinion we held:

“It is not alleged in either of the first two counts that the decedent had by a proper instrument in writing severed his ownership of the land and of the oil therein, if that can be done; and as at the death of decedent, oil that had not then in fact been severed from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Funk v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Arrington v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Miller, Et Vir v. CarrSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Kelly v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Straughn v. Amoco Production CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Straughn v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Coastal Petroleum Co. v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1988
  4. Fisher v. Sun Oil CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. GAC Properties, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Collier County1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API