Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Chattanooga v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1975Published

1ConcurrenceBrock, Justice

I concur in the result reached by my brothers Henry and Fones, but not in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Henry. I particularly disagree with the conclusion that municipalities of this state no longer possess any power to limit the number of retail liquor stores or to limit the permissible locations of such stores within their corporate boundaries. I agree with my brothers Cooper and Harbison that municipal corporations retain such power, but I cannot agree with their conclusion that the attempted exercise of that power by the City of Chattanooga in this instance is a valid one. I shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Veal v. Mayor of DyersburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Lakewood v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Little v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Boyd v. BurmasterTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Safier v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API