Commonwealth v. Cartagena
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
MUNDY, J.:
I respectfully dissent from the learned Majority’s decision to affirm the grant of suppression in this case. In my view, the uncontradicted evidence presented by the Commonwealth at the suppression hearing was sufficient to support a finding of reasonable suspicion on the part of Officer Johncola.
The Majority correctly utilizes the reasonable suspicion standard articulated in Michigan v. Long, 468 U.S. 1032,103 S.Ct. 3469, 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983).1 See Majority Opinion at 298. The United States Supreme Court has consistently observed that routine traffic stops…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Muhammad, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023