Legal Opinion

Thompson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Franklin Circuit Court.—Hon. Rudolph Hirzel, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

Action against the defendant as warehouseman for the value of a trunk and contents, alleged to have been lost through its negligence. The facts are undisputed.

In January, 1893, the defendant was a railroad corporation, and owned a certain warehouse at Sullivan, Missouri, used for the storage of baggage, freight, etc., delivered to it for future transportation.

The plaintiff was moving from Sullivan, Missouri, to Moselle, Missouri. The day before he took the train, he employed one Cary to haul his household goods and trunk to defendant’s depot. Several loads were taken, and in one load the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Wiser v. ChesleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Watts v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad v. ShurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Huxley v. HartzellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Levi v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Fisher v. the Pullman Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. H. A. Johnson & Co. v. Springfield Ice & Refrigerating Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Thomas Canning Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API