Vonville v. Dexter
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Royse, J.
The appellee, in his petition for rehearing, says that in our opinion we have transgressed the well-established rule that an appellate tribunal cannot weigh the evidence and thereby substitute its decision for that of the trial court. He bases his contention on the answer the husband made to certain questions propounded by appellee’s attorney at the conditional examination of the husband before the Referee in Bankruptcy for the Northern District of Indiana in the matter of the husband’s bankruptcy. These.questions and answers are as follows:
“Q. Mr. Vonville,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Grantham Realty Corp. v. Bowers, Jr., Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Ferguson v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.