Legal Opinion
Durr v. Department of Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-1340Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) STEPHEN DURR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-1340 (ABJ) ) DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se plaintiff Stephen Durr, a former soldier in the United States Army, brings this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–706 (“APA”), against the Department of Army and the Office of Attorney General (“defendants”). Plaintiff contends he was wrongfully separated from the Army in 1994. Since that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.