Tolman v. Board of Com'rs

PURNELL, District Judge.

This cause coming on to be heard at Wilmington on this, the 1st day of July, 1905, on the bill and answer and evidence taken before the special master, duly appointed by consent, and being fully argued by counsel, the court finds the following facts to wit: Complainant is the owner of.the coupons set out in the bill. The same were issued after the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina reported in 116 N. C. 563, 21 S. E. 205 (Wilmington, Onslow & Eastern Carolina Railroad Company v. Commissioners of Onslow county), in which it is held: (1) In submitting to the…