Paige v. Ius

In these two actions, which were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, judgments were entered for plaintiffs. They appeal, and assign as the only error the denial of their motions for a new trial. It is their contention that the damages awarded were so inadequate *66as unmistakably to indicate that the verdicts must have been the result of passion or prejudice.

In each case, an order denying the motion for a new trial was entered on March 18, 1953, and final judgment was entered on March 19, 1953. Under Rule on Appeal 34(1), 34A Wn. (2d) 36, it was therefore necessary that the proposed…