Legal Opinion

Nutzhorn v. Sittig

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Agtioit to reform a deed and for other relief.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Do a devise and a bequest fail because of an implied revocation on account of a contract by the testatrix a few months later than the will to sell the lands devised to a purchaser ?

The testatrix, Marie Ernst, taking her title to the realty and personalty from the will of her deceased husband, Otto Ernst, made in 1895, executed her will January 4, 1897, making her relatives and those of her husband beneficiaries, she dying childless. By .that will she devised to her sister, brother, three nephews, and a child of her deceased husband, Mrs. Sittig, severally, six lots, Nos. 101 to 111,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. McGillisNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Burnham v. . ComfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Knight v. WeatherwaxNew York Court of Chancery · 1838

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Washington Escrow Co. v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API