Adoption of Nicole
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
There are four arguments that the biological father presses in his appeal from a decree under G. L. c. 210, § 3, dispensing with his consent to the adoption of his daughter Nicole: 1) the Probate Court judge mistakenly equated his incarceration with parental unfitness; 2) the child welfare agency involved failed to make the effort required by statute to hold the biological family unit together; 3) the judge erroneously denied a motion for a new trial or to amend findings without an evidentiary hearing; and 4) the judge erroneously forbade postadoption visitation by the father. We affirm.
Prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Bezio v. PatenaudeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- In Re the Department of Public Welfare to Dispense With Consent to AdoptionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Adoption of CarlosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- In Re Department of Social Services to Dispense With Consent to AdoptionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Adoption of VitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Adoption of GregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Youmans v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Adoption of WarrenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Adoption of TerrenceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.