Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahmoud (Martinez)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 11, 2019No. 18-758Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-758 United States v. Mahmoud (Martinez) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Tyrone Perez, Also Known as Larry, Also Known as StarkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Myung Ho Kim, Also Known as RobertoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Stephen J. Sabbeth, Carole Sabbeth, Also Known as Carole FioreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. DerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API