Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Graham v. Alliance Hail Ass'n

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1921Published

1Concurrence

Bronson, J

(concurring specially). I concur in the reversal of the *430judgment. After the respective hail storms of August 19 and 21, 1918, two notices of loss were sent to the defendant. These notices were typewritten, signed by the plaintiff, upon stationery of the defendant’s agent, and as the testimony sufficiently shows were sent to the defendant by its agent, the cashier of the bank at Regan. It does not appear in the evidence that these notices were sent by registered letter as required in the by-laws. After an adjuster of the defendant had visited the farm and made an offer of adjustment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Des Moines Mutual Hail & Cyclone InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stockwell v. German Mutual Insurance Ass'n of LeMarsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API