Legal Opinion

Antonio Bermudez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 28, 2015No. 01-14-00160-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Harvey Brown, Justice

A jury found Antonio Bermudez guilty of aggravated assault. 1 He filed a motion for new trial complaining of his trial counsel’s inability to hear unspecified portions of the trial. He further asserted that his attorney’s inability to hear effectively deprived him of his sixth amendment right to counsel. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing. On appeal, he argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not holding a hearing. We hold that (1) Bermudez preserved this issue for appellate review but (2) his motion does not present reasonable grounds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Wright v. Van PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arthur Clarence Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Bermudez v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
  3. Jeff Clay Everitt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
  4. Walter Dennis Dunlap v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API