Murphey v. Shepardson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from, the County Court of Milwanlcee County. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion. The county court confirmed the report of the referee and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount found due. Prom that judgment the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
This action is prosecuted by Newton S. Mur-phey, as surviving partner of the firm of Carpenter & Murphey, to recover for certain professional services ren*413dered and disbursements made in certain actions wherein the defendant was a party. The plaintiff's counsel stated in his argument that the items charged in the plaintiff’s account for disbursements were allowed substantially, and that a satisfactory allowance was made for professional services charged in ail suits except in the five named hereafter. IVe shall therefore confine our attention to the findings and evidence relating to these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shepardson v. CaryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Head v. JamesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Shepardson v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
- Shepardson v. Supervisors of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kleinstick v. DaleidenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Kossuth County State Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1913