Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Monahan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment, for the alleged bribery of a police officer. After verdict of guilty and before judgment the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, assigning various reasons therein. The Superior Court overruled the motion ; and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The indictment in this case is under the Pub. Sts. c. 205, § 9, as amended by the St. of 1891, c. 349, § 1. Every reason assigned in the motion in arrest of judgment relates to the sufficiency of the indictment, and not to the jurisdiction of the court, and should have been taken before verdict. St. 1864, c. 250, § 3. Pub. Sts. c. 214, § 27. Commonwealth v. McGovern, 10 Allen, 193. Commonwealth v. *461Wright, 12 Allen, 190. Commonwealth v. Norton, 13 Allen, 550. Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 13 Allen, 561. Commonwealth v. Hudson, 97 Mass. 565. Commonwealth v. Eagan, 103 Mass. 71.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChiovaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Commonwealth v. CarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Commonwealth v. SwainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Lamagdelaine v. TremblayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ince v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. State v. BerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. CornellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API