Legal Opinion
Smithey v. Johnson Motor Lines
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 17, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
140 N.J. Super. 202 (1976)
356 A.2d 10
LULU SMITHEY, PERSONALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF LEGRAND SMITHEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE JOHNSON MOTOR LINES, WILLIE CLARENCE SMITH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 1, 1976.
Decided March 17, 1976.
Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and ARD.
Mr. David Robinson argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Richard C. Ehnert argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Chasan, Leyner, Holland & Tarrant, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLE, J.A.D.
In this wrongful…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohen v. Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Cohen v. Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- In Re BloomerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- In Re BloomerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Herbst v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Beckwith v. Bethlehem SteelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Katsoufris v. AdamoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- HOBOKEN ENVIRON. COMMITTEE, INC. v. German Seaman's MissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978