Turner v. Western Hydro-Electric Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
The plaintiff, who is a minority stockholder in the defendant company, filed this bill to wind up its affairs, to have its assets distributed among the stockholders, to have a receiver appointed and an accounting from certain of its officers who have been in active management and control of the company’s business. The theory of the bill is that the charter of the corporation was annulled by forfeiture on December 21, 1923, for failure to comply with the corporation tax law; that, on the happening of that event, the title to the corporate property became vested in the stockholders as tenants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York & Long Island Bridge Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People ex rel. Hillel Lodge No. 72 v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Lumber Co. v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Briggs v. Cape Cod Ship Canal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Vermont & Canada Railroad v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gray v. Central Florida Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- State v. Sunset Ditch Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Industrial Coordinators, Inc. v. Artco, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Jarvis v. Chapman Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.