Legal Opinion

Kling v. Railway Construction Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This is an action by plaintiffs, as subcontractors, against the Railway Construction Company as contractors, and the Carondelet Railway Company as owners of a leasehold interest of ten years, and against Mentrup as owner of the fee. Terry, another defendant, claims an interest in the fee, and was made a co-defendant on his own motion.

The Railway Construction Company, in its answer, admits the contract, but denies the correctness of the account, and sets up violations of the contract, and delay in completing the work. The railway company files a general denial. Mentrup, the owner of the fee,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. HynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Lowis v. CutterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mississippi Woodworking Company v. MaherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Martin & Luther General Contractors, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Nicolai v. Van FridaghOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Marsh v. MickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. Christian v. AlleeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API