Legal Opinion

Hawke v. Deffebach

Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota

Decided February 16, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lawrence county. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChurch, J.

These cases, with the one following, [Pierce v. Sparks, post, ] are typical of a series of cases involving the title to a large amount of valuable property in the mining towns of the Black Hills. The two now under consideration present the same essential conditions, and will be so treated; *22the facts hereinafter given being those especially pertaining to the one first mentioned. The case of Pierce v. Sparks presents some different features, which will be separately considered. The actions were for ejectment. The plaintiff averred title in fee-simple to lands embracing the premises in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richmond v. AshcraftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Rosina v. TrowbridgeNevada Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Muhlbauer v. Estate of OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. McKenzie v. GussnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Skinner v. McCrackanWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API