Legal Opinion

Osage Gas Co. v. Cleveland & Morgantown Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1926No. 5465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is an action in assumpsit on the common counts, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover, as evidenced by its bill of particulars, $3,688.00, for casing, drilling, super intendency of drilling and tubing a certain water well. The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict for $3,182.92 was returned. From a judgment entered thereon, the defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

The following facts are disclosed by the evidence: The Purseglove Coal Mining Company and the defendant Cleveland & Morgantown Coal Company, both corporations, were engaged in mining coal on contiguous coal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kimmins v. OldhamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Loverin & Browne Co. v. BumgarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Goodwin v. Tony Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Smith v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Stubner v. United Carbon Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1946
  2. Pollock v. Ohio-Apex, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1955
  3. Bates v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API