Legal Opinion

Arney v. Bryant Sheet Metal, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 25, 1982No. CIV-2-81-253Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDA OPINIONS AND ORDERS

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant Bryant Sheet Metal, Inc. (Bryant) moved the Court to extend the time within which it must respond to the plaintiffs’ first set of interrogatories and to their request for its production of documents for their inspection and copying. Rules 33(a), (b), 34(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By such motion Bryant seeks to delay such discovery until 30 days after the plaintiffs have complied with its request to produce, for Bryant’s inspection and testing, certain component-parts of a furnace. The plaintiffs, in turn, seek a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  2. Hayes v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1968
  3. McElroy v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  4. Wills v. McLean Trucking Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API