Legal Opinion
Nahrebeski v. Molnar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 2001PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b) seeking dismissal of each defendant’s affirmative defense of contributory negligence. Plaintiff failed to support his motion “with an affidavit by one with personal knowledge of the facts or other evidentiary proof’ (Arriaga v Laub Co., 233 AD2d 244). The vehicle accident report and police reports submitted by plaintiff constitute inadmissible hearsay and thus fail to establish the manner in which the accident occurred (see, Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Letterman v. ReddingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Warwick v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Island Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Arriaga v. Michael Laub Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nizam v. FriolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Broyles v. Town of EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Uhteg v. KendraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- MS Partnership v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Stopani v. Allegany Co-op InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.