Eisenhart v. Coach Systems, Inc.

Buckingham, J.,

— According to her complaint, plaintiff parked her car at defendant’s parking lot. While not expressly stated in the complaint, it is implicit therein that this was a mutual type of bailment or bailment for hire. The complaint further alleges that plaintiff demanded the return of the car, that defendant failed or refused to return same to plaintiff, defendant’s agent, John Rudisill, having delivered possession of the car to another, that the car was damaged while in the possession of defendant, and that the damage was due to the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff seeks damages…