Legal Opinion

Gore v. Mackie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Miriam Olmo dismissed. Memo*880randum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of Miriam Olmo (defendant) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint to the extent that it alleges that she violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a). Defendant established as a matter of law that her keys were “hidden from sight about the vehicle for convenience or emergency” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 [a]; see, Banellis v Yackel, 49 NY2d 882, 884). Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Banellis v. YackelNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Omara v. PoliseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  4. In re the Arbitration between Carp & Van TasselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Sherri v. GerwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. BivensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Schutte v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Alvarez v. BivensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API