Legal Opinion
Whittemore v. Patten
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Decided November 15, 1897No. 687PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Bill for an accounting filed by Charles A. Whittemore against William H. Patten and Norman Stafford, co-partners as Patten & Stafford. Heard on exceptions to answer.
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
This is a suit for an accounting as to transactions had under a contract, of which the following is a copy:
“This agreement, made this eighth day of Sept.. 1885, by and belween Wm. H. Patten, Norman Stafford, and John E. Myer, all of Canastota, in the state of New York, co-partners under firm name of Patten, Stafford and Myer, doing business in said Canastota, and Charles A. Whittemore, of Melrose, Massachusetts, witnesseth: That said Patten, Stafford and Myer, in consideration of the promises of said Whittemore hereinafter set forth, do hereby appoint said Whittemore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Lautz v. GordonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1886
- Brooks v. ByamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840
- Crouch v. KerrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wootton Land & Fuel Co. v. OwnbeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Valdez v. State Ex Rel. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Alywin v. MorleyMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Eagan v. MahoneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.