Legal Opinion
State v. OLM
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 12, 2010No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0254PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 The state appeals the trial court’s grant of Ryan Ray Olm’s motion to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless search of his vehicle. The state argues Olm had no protected privacy interest in the front yard of his home where the vehicle had been parked. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we consider only the evidence presented at the suppression hearing, State v. Blackmore, 186 Ariz. 630, 631, 925 P.2d 1347, 1348 (1996), and view that evidence in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. BlakleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-LoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.