Cannan v. Cannan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In determining the amount of support payments a party is capable of paying, it is the party’s net income adjusted for business expenses that should form the basis of the calculations (Dobbins v Dobbins, 59 AD2d 548; Somach v Somach, 49 AD2d *1086592; Burstein v Burstein, 7 AD2d 902). We are not bound by the husband’s assertions as to his expenses and find the court-appointed examiner’s determination of his net income supported by the record. We also find that the husband’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dobbins v. DobbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Somach v. SomachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Burstein v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bottitta v. BottittaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re WoolseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Walsh v. WalshNew York City Family Court · 1987