Legal Opinion
Pinellas County v. Hooker
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 23, 1967No. 7503PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LILES, Judge.
Pinellas County sought to enjoin a violation of zoning regulations enacted pursuant to Chapter 26164, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1949. The .original complaint alleged that George T. Othen was operating an establishment for the servicing, repair and maintenance of mechanical and electrical contrivances commonly known as “jukeboxes” and “pinball machines” and other similar items, in a zone designated R-4 for residential purposes. Commercial uses in this R-4 classification were prohibited. John C. Hooker was the owner of the property and was allowing it to be used by Othen.
Defendants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Philbrick v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Jacobsen v. PadgettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rich v. RyalsSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- SIRGANY INTERN., INC. v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- City of Minneapolis v. F AND R, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Heinlein v. Dade County, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1969