Legal Opinion

Florimon v. Xu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

This litigation arises out of a contract executed on June 10, 2005, for the sale by the defendants of certain vacant land in Queens to the plaintiff. The parties agreed to a purchase price of $380,000, with the plaintiff depositing a down…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bohlen Industries of North America, Inc. v. Flint Oil & Gas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Birch v. McNallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Brois v. DeLucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Morgan Services, Inc. v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API