Legal Opinion

Gleeson v. Lichty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1911No. 9226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered December 13, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against C. A. Jones, J. S. Lichty and wife, and E. C. Rumens and wife, to recover upon a note for $2,000, upon which $500 had been paid. The note was made by Farmers’ Mutual Live Stock Insurance Company to the plaintiff. Two causes of action were alleged: (1) That the defendants C. A. Jones, J. S. Lichty and C. J. Rumens were liable on the note as guarantors; (2) that they were hable as indorsers, and that due presentment and notice to said indorsers had been given as provided by law. The defendants by their answer admitted the making of the note by the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northern Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Villegas v. Nationstar Mortg., LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Darla Pardo v. Rco LegalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Kevin J. Selkowitz, App. v. Litton Loan Servicing Lp, Et Ano., Resps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Peoples Bank and Trust Company v. Feldman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API