Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1989No. 67649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo

The instant action stems from an underlying wrongful death case in which the $1.5 million judgment exceeded the insurance coverage provided by the primary insurer, defendant, Aetna Casualty and Insurance Company (Aetna). The excess insurer, plaintiff, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford), filed a complaint for declaratory relief and damages in January of 1987, seeking, in count I, a determination that Hartford was not liable for post-judgment interest that accrued on the portion of the underlying judgment for which Hartford provided excess coverage, and seeking, in counts II and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Safety Casualty Insurance v. City of WaukeganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Safeway Ins. Co. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Acceptance Insurance Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API