Huber Hoge, Inc. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The above-entitled case was tried to a jury when it appeared that no disputed issue of f aet was involved. An alternative verdict was returned, the jury finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,195.87 with an alternative that if, as matter of law, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, a defendant’s verdict might be entered upon order of this court. A motion to set aside the verdict for the plaintiff and to direct a verdict for the defendant was duly filed, which has been considered on oral arguments and briefs.
The plaintiff holds itself out to the publie as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Connell v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krupnick and Associates, Inc. v. HellmichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- HW Kastor & Sons Adv. Co. v. Grove LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
- Krupnick and Associates, Inc. v. HellmichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964