Legal Opinion

Huber Hoge, Inc. v. Smith & Wesson, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 24, 1928No. 3062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The above-entitled case was tried to a jury when it appeared that no disputed issue of f aet was involved. An alternative verdict was returned, the jury finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,195.87 with an alternative that if, as matter of law, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, a defendant’s verdict might be entered upon order of this court. A motion to set aside the verdict for the plaintiff and to direct a verdict for the defendant was duly filed, which has been considered on oral arguments and briefs.

The plaintiff holds itself out to the publie as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Connell v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krupnick and Associates, Inc. v. HellmichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. HW Kastor & Sons Adv. Co. v. Grove LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  3. Krupnick and Associates, Inc. v. HellmichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API