Legal Opinion

LaRose v. LaRose

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 7, 2012No. 2110655PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Judge.

This is the second time these parties have appeared before this court related to protection-from-abuse proceedings in the Cullman Circuit Court. We set forth the pertinent procedural history in LaRose v. LaRose, 71 So.3d 651 (Ala.Civ.App.2011), as follows:1

“On April 18, 2010, Ann LaRose (‘the paternal grandmother’) and Kelly Hill (‘the paternal aunt’) came to Alabama to exercise visitation with Vanessa LaRose *823(‘the child’) pursuant to a South Carolina consent judgment awarding the paternal grandmother and Joseph P. LaRose III (‘the paternal grandfather’) unsupervised visitation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. H.J.T. v. State ex rel. M.S.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Eagerton v. Second Econ. Dev. Coop. Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. R.L. v. J.E.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poole v. PooleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API