Legal Opinion

People v. Meddows

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 1978No. 77-248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

This is an appeal by the State pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)(1)) from an order of the trial court suppressing certain statements of the defendant and physical evidence seized from the trunk of his car. The suppression was ordered on the basis of the court’s finding that these items of evidence were the “fruits” of a prior custodial interrogation that was not preceded by advising defendant of his constitutional rights in accord with Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 A.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602.

The question on appeal is whether…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. WipflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. NewsomeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. People v. MeddowsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. FarmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. LangloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. MeddowsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API