Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Boyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1948No. Appeal, 91PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The husband brought this action for divorce on the ground of indignities, which he averred continued from 1935 to June, 1942, when he left the respondent. The master found the indignities had occurred, but recommended the dismissal of the libel because he was not satisfied that the wife was mentally responsible for her acts. The court below found the indignities were not established and accordingly dismissed, and the libellanthusband appealed. With a slight modification the order of the court below will be affirmed, but for a different reason.

The libel was filed October…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fazio v. Pittsburgh Railways CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maurer v. WitkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Hickey v. HickeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Faivre v. FaivreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. McCaskey v. McCaskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Verbalis v. VerbalisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Com. v. Hurd, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Kogan v. Kogan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API