Legal Opinion
United States v. McDaniel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 1957No. Cr. 980-56PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is a motion to suppress certain evidence on the ground that it was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The defendants McDaniel and Williams join in this motion.
The seized article was a towel which was found in a room of which the defendant McDaniel was a sub-tenant, he having sub-rented the room from the defendant Williams. The defendant Williams claims ownership of the seized property. Consequently, under the rule of the Jeffers case (Jeffers v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 187 F.2d 498, affirmed 342 U.S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- United States v. StricklandDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Sneed v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- The People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.