People v. Woodworth
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOMES, J.
James Franklin Woodworth 1 was convicted of several counts related to the sexual assault of the victim, C. He argues the trial court committed two errors at sentencing. First, he contends the trial court did not recognize it had discretion to impose a concurrent sentence on the count charging him with dissuading a witness from testifying by force or threat. The dissuading a witness count was based on Woodworth’s threat to harm C. if she reported the assault to the police. These facts implicated Penal Code section 1170.15, 2 which provides the trial court must impose a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Ayala CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Fernandez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. FortinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Gonzalez CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Jennings CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.