Legal Opinion
McGraw Edison Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2410 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
The McGraw-Edison Company (Employer) appeals from a decision by the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees decision to reinstate a Notice of Compensation Payable to Adam Buechel, Jr. (Claimant). We affirm.
On October 21, 1978, Claimant suffered a compensable injury in the course of his employment as a tube barrier with Employer when his left hand got caught between the two rollers of the machine he was operating. The injury required extensive surgery, including skin grafts. Pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable dated November 27,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- McGartland v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Klaric v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Columbus Service International & Underwriters Adjusting Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- L.E. Smith Glass Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986